Joseph Smith and World Government

 

Hyrum L. Andrus

1998 Hyrum L. Andrus. All rights reserved.

Deseret Book Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

 

   

Preface

 

For some time I have had a deep interest in the social, economic and political aspects of Joseph Smith's thought. That interest prompted me in large measure to organize my graduate studies at Brigham Young University and at Syracuse University around the Prophet and the historical picture of his day. Thus, my major academic interest has been in the religious, social, economic and political picture in America between the time of the founding of our Constitution and the American Civil War, and to study the rise and development of the Church in this historical background. My master's thesis and my doctoral dissertation were both written on the Prophet Joseph Smith and his effort to set the mold of a new socio-religious, economic and political system that would eventually rise to world-wide power and influence.   

Since completing my doctoral studies in 1955, my interest in the above studies has continued. This volume is in large part the result of research since that time. It is, however, based in many ways upon my previous research and includes many of my former findings.   

The material here presented is a part of a larger study I have had underway for several years-that of producing a work that will adequately define Joseph Smith's social, economic and political concepts in their religious setting, while placing the Prophet in context with the historical picture of his age. But because of the importance and nature of the information contained in the present volume, it seems proper to publish it at this time. I take full responsibility for the views herein set forth.   

I wish to acknowledge the assistance of those who have aided me in my studies over the past years. They include the members of my graduate committee at Brigham Young University and at Syracuse University. Grateful acknowledgment is also made to the Church Historian's Office for important material that has gone into this volume; to Jacob Heinerman, of the Cottage Book Store, Provo, for assistance in locating pertinent information; and to my wife, parents, students and friends for the encouragement they have given to me along the way. I also wish to thank Dean B. Farnsworth and Soren F. Cox of the Brigham Young University faculty for checking the manuscript for grammatical errors and others of the faculty for reading parts of the manuscript and offering helpful suggestions.   

-THE AUTHOR   

  


 

Introduction

 

This book is the first work published in modern times which sets forth the concept of the government of God which was revealed through Joseph Smith and shows the significance of that concept in the westward move of the Latter-day Saints from Illinois, and the colonization of the West under Brigham Young. It is also the first work written to show that Joseph Smith actually organized the nucleus of that divine political system on earth, in the form of the General Council or, as it was nicknamed, the Council of Fifty.   

During the first half of the twentieth century the knowledge of the General Council was virtually lost to the world, and it was only after the publication of A Mormon Chronicle: The Diaries of John D. Lee, 1848-1876, in 1955, that substantial progress was made in bringing the knowledge of this political body to light in recent times. In the fall of 1955, J. Keith Melville and I were on the faculty of Ricks College, in Rexburg, Idaho, where I taught a class that academic year on the social, economic, and political thought of Joseph Smith. Melville had written his master's thesis, in 1949, on "The Political Philosophy of Brigham Young," and was then working on his doctoral dissertation (which he completed in 1956), entitled "The Political Ideas of Brigham Young." In 1952, I wrote my master's thesis on the subject "World Government as Envisioned in the Latter-day Saint 'City of Zion,'" and in the summer of 1955 I completed my doctoral dissertation entitled "Joseph Smith, Social Philosopher, Theorist and Prophet."   

Until the publication of Lee's diaries, neither Melville or I realized that the government of God was more than an ideal in early Latter-day Saint thought-that there had been an actual political organ started by Joseph Smith. During the fall quarter at Ricks College, 1955, Melville called my attention to a statement in Lee's diary which indicated that the political organ of the kingdom had been a practical and functional thing. The editors of his diaries, however, apparently had little correct understanding of it. But with our background, we could see the significance of Lee's disclosures.   

Beginning at that time, I started to gather and relate information on the role of the Council of Fifty among the Latter-day Saints. In the fall of 1956, I accepted a position on the faculty of the Brigham Young University where I continued my research and probed the subject further at the Church Historian's Library in Salt Lake City. I also gave lectures and conducted discussions both on and off campus on the subject of the government of God, at which faculty members from the departments of religions, history and political science were present, with interested students. As a result, there was much interest created in the subject, and from that interest further research has been done by myself and others. In the spring of 1958, this volume came from the press as the first published analysis of the government of God and its role in Latter-day Saint history in recent times, giving the results of my research on the activities of the General Council to that time.   

Hyrum L. Andrus   

   

Chapter I

The Kingdom of God

 

A MIGHTY vision filled the mind of Joseph Smith, the Mormon Prophet: "I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world," he emphatically declared. "It will not be by sword or gun that this kingdom will roll on; the power of truth is such that all nations will be under the necessity of obeying the gospel."   

Joseph Smith did not limit his concept of the Gospel program to the religious sphere of life. To him, it extended into the area of the social, where it pointed out correct doctrine an philosophy relative to such matters as education, recreation, and marriage; it gave to the world a divine system of economics, known as the Law of Consecration and Stewardship; and, finally, it gave promise of a political law that would emanate from the Priesthood, to govern the world in righteousness. So important was the latter program that the Prophet argued that the establishment of Zion's political program "is the only thing that can bring about the 'restitution of all things spoken of by all the holy Prophets since the world was'-'the dispensation of the fulness of times, when God shall gather together all things in one'" In anticipation of this future era, he wrote to Henry Clay: "I long for a day of righteousness, when 'He whose right it is to reign shall judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth'; and I pray God, who hath given our Fathers a promise of a perfect government in the last days, to purify the hearts of the people and hasten the welcome day."   

It is an assumption within Mormon thought that Joseph Smith was privileged to lay the foundation of the Dispensation of the Fulness of Times mentioned above, in which the expected restoration of all things must eventually be brought about. By this own reasoning, then, the Prophet would not have completed his mission in life had he confined himself to the realm of the religious-had he not given by revelation the basic political principles and philosophy of the millennial government for which he sought.   

On March 11, 1844, Joseph Smith organized a body of men as the nucleus of the new government. During the period of its existence, this political group was referred to by several names. At the time of its organization and immediately thereafter, the Prophet spoke of it as a "Special Council." Later, he termed it the "General Council"; and after his death this appellation was reduced to the "Council."   

A popular name used to designate this body of men was the "Council of Fifty." This name is derived from the number of men composing the initial organization during the lifetime of Joseph Smith. George Miller, a prominent bishop in the Church at that time, noted that "up to the number of fifty three" men were given membership in the group. Miller's testimony is partially supported by Brigham Young, who said: "The Council was composed of about fifty members." Benjamin F. Johnson, another member of the group, although not as specific as Miller, later wrote that the Council "at times would exceed fifty in number." It should be noted that available sources nowhere indicate that this body was to be specifically made up of fifty men. There is some evidence that Brigham Young added considerably to its number. This being true, the name Council of Fifty could be somewhat misleading.   

Since the council was considered as the nucleus of God's future government on earth, it was also termed the "Council of the Kingdom." This name may have originated from an unpublished revelation to Joseph Smith on the subject of the political aspects of the Kingdom of God. By this name, it stated, ye shall be known: "The Kingdom of God and His laws, with the keys and powers thereof and judgment in the hands of his servants." When viewed in this light, the term Kingdom of God had a broader meaning than is usually applied to it when it is used to denote the Church of God. Brigham Young explained by first referring to the various organizations that make up the Church and then stating:   

This is what we are in the habit of calling the Kingdom of God. But there are further organizations. The Prophet gave a full and complete organization of this kingdom the spring before he was killed. . . . The Kingdom of God will protect every person, every sect and all people upon the face of the whole earth in their legal rights; I shall not tell you the names of the members of this kingdom, neither shall I read to you its constitution, but the constitution was given by revelation. The day will come when it will be organized in strength and power.   

Another member of this body made a similar explanation. To quote:   

This council alluded to is the municipal department of the Kingdom of God set up on the earth, from which all law emanates, for the rule, government and control of all nations, kingdoms, and tongues and people under the whole heavens, but not to control the Priesthood, but to council, deliberate and plan for the general good and upbuilding of the Kingdom of God on the earth.   

From the above statements it can be seen that the term Kingdom of God had reference to the complete program to be administered eventually by the powers of the priesthood. That program envisioned the development of both a Church and a State. Said John Taylor:   

Was the kingdom that the Prophets talked about, that should be set up in the latter times, going to be a Church? Yes. And a state? Yes, it was going to be both Church and State. . . .   

The foundation of the Kingdom of God rests in the priesthood. Joseph Smith explained that the Kingdom of God had been on the earth "whenever there has been a righteous man on earth unto whom God revealed His word and gave power and authority to administer in His name, and where there is a priest of God-a minister who has power and authority from God to administer in the ordinances of the gospel and officiate in the priesthood of God." As the basis of the kingdom of God, the priesthood was considered as having two functionaries to administer its law and carry out its program in the earth. The first of these organizations is the Church. As an instrument of the priesthood, it is dependent upon the priesthood for its power to officiate in the religious sphere of life. The second organizational tool of the priesthood is the Government of God, which functions in the political sphere of society.   

As an instrument of the priesthood, the Church was to play an important role in producing the Government of God. Said Brigham Young:   

The Church of Jesus Christ will produce this government, and cause it to grow and spread, and it will be a shield round about the Church. And under the influence and power of the Kingdom of God, the Church of God will rest secure and dwell in safety, without taking the trouble of governing and controlling the whole earth. The Kingdom of God will do this, it will control the kingdoms of the world.   

Were the Church to fulfil its responsibility in establishing the Government of God all things would then be under the jurisdiction of the priesthood. Said John Taylor on this subject:   

When the will of God is done on earth as it is in heaven, the priesthood will be the only legitimate ruling power under the whole heavens; for every other power and influence will be subject to it. When the millennium . . . is introduced all potentates, powers, and authorities-every man, woman, and child will be in subjection to the Kingdom of God; they will be under the power and dominion of the priesthood of God; then the will of God will be done on the earth as it is done in heaven.   

Since the Church was to play an important role in establishing the Government of God on the earth, the organization of the Church has been considered as the beginning of the latter organization. Orson Pratt viewed matters in this light, and in 1872 declared:   

Forty-two years ago, on the 6th day of April, the Prophet Joseph Smith was commanded by the Lord Almighty to organize the Kingdom of God on the earth for the last time-to set up and make a beginning-to form the nucleus of a Government that never should be destroyed from the earth, or, in other words, that should stand forever. . . . There is now organized on the earth a Government which never will be broken as former Governments have been. This will stand forever. It began very small-only six members were organized in this Government on Tuesday the 6th day of April, 1830. . . .   

Brigham Young has already been quoted as stating that the constitution of the Government of God was given to Joseph Smith through revelation. Evidently that revelation clarified the principles upon which the new government was to rest, and how it was to be associated with the Church in the full program of the Kingdom of God. President Young and others referred on more than one occasion to the latter question, stating that the political organ "grows out of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but it is not the Church," The separate nature of the two organizations implied in his statement is amply attested; for instance, it has already been noted that, while the political kingdom had been established for governmental purposes, it was not to control the priesthood.   

When the nucleus of the Government of God was first organized by the Prophet, Brigham Young reported that it had as members "several" men who "were not members of the Church." This fact of itself would indicate that the political organ was not to be identical with the Church. That this was right and proper Brigham Young explained:   

. . . A man may be a legislator in that body which will issue laws to sustain the inhabitants of the earth in their individual rights and still not belong to the Church of Jesus Christ at all. And further though a man may not even believe in any religion it would be perfectly right, when necessary, to give him the privilege of holding a seat among that body which will make laws to govern all the nations of the earth and control those who make no profession of religion at all; for that body would be governed, controlled and dictated to acknowledge others in those rights which they wish to enjoy themselves.   

Among others who understood Joseph Smith's views on this subject and expressed them from time to time was George Q. Cannon, who said:   

We are asked, Is the Church of God, and the Kingdom of God the same organization? and we are informed that some of the brethren hold that they are separate.   

This is the correct view to take. The Kingdom of God is a separate organization from the Church of God. There may be men acting as officers in the Kingdom of God who will not be members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. On this point the Prophet Joseph gave particular instructions before his death, and gave an example, which he asked the younger elders who were present to always remember. It was to the effect that men might be chosen to officiate as members of the Kingdom of God who had no standing in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Kingdom of God when established will not be for the protection of the Church of Jesus Christ alone, but for the protection of all men, whatever their religious views or opinions may be. Under its rule, no one will be permitted to overstep the proper bounds or to interfere with the rights of others.   

This concept of separation of Church and State was also emphasized when, following the death of Joseph Smith, George Miller and Alex Badlam wanted "to call together the Council of Fifty and organize the Church." In reply, "They were told that the Council of Fifty was not a Church organization, but was composed of members irrespective of their religious faith and organized for the purpose of consulting on the best manner of obtaining redress of grievances from our enemies, and to devise means to find and locate in some place where we could live in peace; and that the organization of the Church belonged to the Priesthood alone."   

It should further be noted that, even though Joseph Smith and the Quorum of the Twelve were members of the General Council, those who were members, said Benjamin F. Johnson, did not include "all of the constituted authorities of the Church, for Presidents [Sidney] Rigdon, [William] Law or [William] Marks, the High Council, or presidents of quorums were not members of that council." The Council of Fifty was not merely a body of the leading authorities in the Church. Rigdon and Law were Joseph's Counselors in the First Presidency of the Church, and Marks was then president of the Nauvoo Stake.   

According to Benjamin F. Johnson, the Prophet's "last charge" to the Quorum of the Twelve was made at a meeting of the General Council. At that time Joseph Smith indicated that the Church and the political kingdom were two separate bodies. Said Johnson of the Prophet:   

. . . He stood before that association of his select friends, including all of the Twelve, and with great feeling and animation he graphically reviewed his life of persecution, labor and sacrifice for the church and the Kingdom of God, both of which he declared were now organized upon the earth, the burden of which had become too great for him longer to carry, that he was weary and tired with the weight he had so long borne, and he then said, with great vehemence: "And in the name of the Lord, I now shake from my shoulders the responsibility of bearing off the Kingdom of God to all the world, and here and now I place that responsibility, with all the keys, powers and privileges pertaining thereto, upon the shoulders of you the Twelve Apostles, in connection with this council; and if you will accept this, to do it, God shall bless you mightily and shall open your way; and if you do it not you will be damned.   

Though the Church and the political government were held to be separate bodies, the fact that the latter was considered as growing "out of the Church" implies some sort of union between the two organizations. On the subject a prominent Mormon scholar wrote that "the Church must be regarded as part" of the political organization; "an essential indeed, for it is the germ from which the kingdom is to be developed, and the very heart of the organization." John Taylor also explained:   

We talk sometimes about the church of God, and why? We talk about the Kingdom of God [i.e., the envisioned system with worldwide political authority], and why? Because, before there could be a kingdom of God, there must be a church of God, and hence the first principles of the gospel were needed to be preached to all nations, as they were formerly when the Lord Jesus Christ and others made their appearance on the earth. And why so? Because of the impossibility of introducing the law of God among a people who would not be subject to and be guided by the spirit of revelation. Hence the world have generally made great mistakes upon these points. They have started various projects to try to unite and cement the people together without God; but they could not do it. Fourierism, communism-another branch of the same thing-and many other principles of the same kind have been introduced to try and cement the human family together. And then we have had peace societies, based upon the same principles. But all these things have failed, and they will fail, because, however philanthropic, humanitarian, benevolent, or cosmopolitan our ideas, it is impossible to produce a true and correct union without the Spirit of the living God and the Spirit can only be imparted through the ordinances of the gospel. Hence Jesus told his disciples to go and preach the gospel to every creature. . . . It was by this cementing, uniting spirit, that true sympathetic, fraternal relations could be introduced and enjoyed.   

A study of Mormon thought in light of the above church and state relationship indicates that several factors were held to be important in bringing about the development of the political kingdom, as it was to grow out of the Church. First, the Church was not accepted as merely a religious body, but as a society with a socio-religious and economic program similar to the ancient Zion of Enoch where the people were said to be of "one heart and one mind, and dwelt in righteousness," and had "no poor among them." To develop such a system of brotherhood and union, the cementing faith and uniting powers of the gospel were held to be important. Individual faith sufficiently strong to release the power of God's Spirit into the lives of the people was accepted as the initial step in developing the necessary union. Repentance was necessary to reconcile the individual to God, that he might be at peace with his neighbor. Baptism, with its holy covenant to serve both God and men, was important to dedicate the people to brotherhood. And, finally, reception of spiritual light and truth through the gift of the Holy Ghost, as bestowed upon each individual through the powers of a living priesthood, was accepted as a vital key in developing each person toward a knowledge of all truth and the realization of full and mature brotherly union.   

Thus united through the assistance of religious and spiritual forces, the society of Zion was expected to develop the new social and economic principles revealed through Joseph Smith. The successful achievement of this task may be said to be the second preliminary factor in developing the Church to the point where the political program of the kingdom might be developed. In achieving this goal, the society of Zion was expected to become "independent of every incumbrance beneath the celestial kingdom, by bonds and covenants of mutual friendship and mutual love." A revelation to Joseph Smith stated the need for Zion to attain such a condition of independence, that she might properly fulfil her political responsibilities. After speaking of the economic principles of the system, it said:   

Behold, this is the preparation wherewith I prepare you, and the foundation, and the ensample which I give unto you whereby you may accomplish the commandments which are given you;   

That through my providence, notwithstanding the tribulation which shall descend upon you, that the church may stand independent above all other creatures beneath the celestial world;   

That you may come up unto the crown prepared for you and be made rulers over many kingdoms.   

Thus united as a body of free men, the society of Zion was to become a standard of correct social organization. Centered at the focal point of interest in the newly developed world order, the Saints could, by the force of example, command the attention of all men, urging them to emulate the example that Zion set. Mormon literature is filled with statements to the effect that one day the wise and learned of the earth will come to Zion to learn of her ways that they might walk in her paths. One of the crying needs of the world is for such a standard as the Prophet envisioned to be developed fully and recognized by all men for its ability to cope with the social and economic problems of society without turning to the state and socializing its functions. The use of Zion's covenant system as such a standard must be recognized as a paramount feature in Joseph Smith's concept of a new world government based upon an unsocialized theory of government.   

Finally, by developing the society of Zion as above indicated, there would be a stable and united body capable of initiating the political program of the kingdom on a theocratic basis. God could then dictate, through revelation, the affairs of His kingdom on earth. Only by a sufficient number of people acquiring a knowledge of the necessary spiritual truths and applying them in their lives could the Government of God be established upon the proper basis, under a true relationship with God.   

The Latter-day Saint concept of a theocratic government was said to have little relationship to many theocracies of the past. Brigham Young explained as follows:   

What do the world understand theocracy to be? A poor, rotten government of man, that would say, without the shadow of provocation or just cause, "Cut that man's head off; put that one on the racl, arrest another, and retain him in unlawful and unjust dress while you plunder his property and pollute his wife and daughters; massacre here and there." The Lord Almighty does nothing of that kind, neither does any man who is controlled by his Spirit.   

The theocratic government organized by Joseph Smith was held to be a perfect instrument. Said Orson Pratt of the newly organized political organ:   

There is a nucleus of a government, formed since that of the United States, which is perfect in its nature. It is perfect, having emanated from a Being who is perfect.   

Brigham Young shared such views. Zion's theocratic government, he stated, "is the only true form of government on the earth." As a theocracy, the Government of God, he explained on another occasion, "will be controlled upon the same basis, in part, as that of the Government of the United States; and it will govern and protect in their rights the various classes of men, irrespective of their different modes of worship."   

The implied relationship between the concept of government under the Constitution of the United States and the concept of government under the Kingdom of God is a matter of interest and importance. In the field of political thought, the Latter-day Saints maintain that the United States Constitution was divinely inspired; and, as John Taylor once stated, it "was the entering wedge for the introduction of a new era, and in it were introduced principles for the birth and organization of a new world." The establishment of the Constitution of the United States was also looked upon as a preparatory development necessary to the later establishment of the Kingdom of God. Without it there could not have existed "sufficient liberty of conscience," said Brigham Young, to establish the Saints and develop the latter program.   

But the Constitution of the United States was looked upon as more than a preparatory development, guaranteeing the necessary freedom to establish God's kingdom on the earth. It was, said Orson Pratt, "a stepping stone to a form of government infinitely greater and more perfect-a government founded upon Divine laws, and officers appointed by the God of heaven." On another occasion, Pratt combined the ideas in the above statements in the following explanation:   

. . . The Lord had a hand in framing [the] . . . Constitution. Why did not the Lord, at the time, introduce a perfect government-a theocracy? It was simply because the people were not prepared for it. . . . They were far from being prepared for the government of God, which is a government of union.   

But will the government of the United States continue forever? No, it is not sufficiently perfect; and, notwithstanding it has been sanctioned by the Lord at a time when it was suited to the circumstances of the people, yet the day will come . . . when the United States government, and all others, will be uprooted, and the kingdoms of this world will be united in one, and the kingdom of our God will govern the whole earth. . . .   

The nucleus of such a government is formed, and its laws have emanated from the throne of God. . . .   

It was for this purpose, then, that a republic was organized upon this continent, to prepare the way for a kingdom which shall have dominion over all the earth to the ends thereof.   

It was with the concept of the Kingdom of God and its program of peace in mind that Pratt exclaimed:   

O America! how art thou favored above all lands! O happy Republic, how exalted above all nations! Within thee is the Kingdom of God! Thou wast chosen to prepare its way! It must increase, but thou shalt decrease! Thou didst lift up thy voice and cry to the nations, Behold here are liberty and freedom for all; but that which came after thee shall thoroughly purge the floor, and restore everlasting peace and liberty to the whole earth.   

The new government was not to be founded upon principles adverse to the Constitution of the United States. Instead, it was to be founded in those principles and further perfect the means by which they might be extended to the peoples of the earth. Said Orson Pratt:   

. . . All the great and glorious principles incorporated in this great republic will be incorporated in the kingdom of God and be preserved. I mean the principles of civil and religious liberty, especially, and all other good principles that are contained in that great instrument framed by our forefathers will be incorporated in the kingdom of God; and only in this manner can all that is good in this and in foreign governments be preserved.   

It was Joseph Smith's contention, Benjamin F. Johnson reported, that all people would one day "learn war no more" by "adopting the God-given Constitution of the United States as a Paladium [sic] of Liberty and Equal Rights." "When the day comes in which the Kingdom of God will bear rule," Brigham Young also explained, "the flag of the United States will proudly flutter unsullied on the flag staff of liberty and equal rights, without a spot to sully its fair surface; the glorious flag our fathers have bequeathed to us will then be unfurled to the breeze by those who have power to hoist it aloft and defend its sanctity."   

To establish the Kingdom of God in its political power, the Constitution of the United States was to be brought into association with Zion's socio-religious and economic society in such a way as to grant the appropriate priesthood councils in Zion the power to nominate men to political office, followed by a vote of approval or disapproval by the people over whom the officers were to have political jurisdiction. John Taylor explained:   

The proper mode of government is this-God first speaks, and then the people have their action. It is for them to say whether they will have his dictation or not. They are free: they are independent under God. The government of God is not a species of priestcraft . . . where one man dictates and everybody obeys without having a voice in it. We have our voice and agency, and act with the most perfect freedom; still we believe there is a correct order-some wisdom and knowledge somewhere that is superior to ours: that wisdom and knowledge proceeds from God through the medium of the Holy Priesthood. We be-lieve that no man or set of men, of their own wisdom and by their own talents, are capable of governing the human family aright.   

These are our opinions. We believe that it requires the same wisdom that governs the planetary system, that produces seed time and harvest, day and night, that organized our system, and that implanted intelligence in finite man-that it needs the same intelligence to govern men and promote their happiness upon the earth that it does to control and keep in order the heavenly bodies; and we believe that that cannot be found with man independently.   

Since the Church, with its priesthood authority, was the body out of which the political organ was to be developed, and, since the priesthood was thereafter to have power to name men to political office, with the consent of the people, the Government of God could be said to grow out of the Church. But following the appointment of men to political office there was then to be a constitutional separation of powers between Zion and the political government. In this way the Church and the State were to be separate bodies; for example, in our present Federal government the judicial branch, in a sense, grows out of the executive branch, in that its officers have their origin as judges in the nomination of the President. But following such nominations and a vote of consent by the Senate, federal judges become separate and independent officers, subject only to the covenants and by-laws which govern their actions in office. So also with Zion and her political government: the latter was pictured as growing out of the former body, but thereafter there was to be a constitutional separation of powers between the two organizations. In other respects, government as upheld by the Kingdom of God would very much resemble government under the United States Constitution. Said Brigham Young:   

But few, if any, understand what a theocratic government is. In every sense of the word, it is a republican government, and differs but little in form from our National, State, and Territorial Governments; but its subjects will recognize the will and dictation of the Almighty. . . .   

The Constitution and laws of the United States resemble a theocracy more closely than any government now on earth. . . . Even now the form of the Government of the United States differs but little from the Kingdom of God.   

A republican form of government reposes authority in the people who give their consent to be governed by representatives acting in their behalf and according to their best interests. The Government of God was to be founded upon this basic principle of republicanism. In addition, it was to recognize the ruling power of God. But since Mormon philosophy positively asserts that it is God's work and glory to bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man, even the authority of God was to serve the best interests of the people. Thus, the Prophet's concept of theocracy, while adding a desirable element of righteous authority, was held to be republican in spirit. Brigham Young spoke of the new government as the only true government on earth, "that possesses all the true principles of republicanism." Since the Government of God was to be largely based upon the voice of the people, President Young also spoke of it as a "true democratic theocracy." In short, he declared that if the new government were set up the people would "find it a Republican Democratic Government."   

The development of the Government of God on a theocratic basis would naturally eliminate the role of political parties as instruments for installing men in government office. Orson Pratt made this point clear in declaring, "There will be no party politicians." On another occasion he spoke of carrying out the principles of the Constitution, "according to the order of union and oneness which prevails among the people of God."   

Excluding the church and state relationship conceived by Joseph Smith, however, it should be noted that such a concept of government as he held is similar to, if not almost identical with, the ideal sought by the Founding Fathers of the United States Constitution. They, too, envisioned a stable and united government that excluded political parties from affairs of government. The Fathers did not intend that political parties should be associated with government under the Constitution. In fact, they purposely devised the machinery of government to minimize the influence of parties in government operations. Thus, Madison introduced the argument of his famous Federalist, No. 10, where he discussed the subject, by stating: "Among the numerous advantages promised by a well-constructed Union, none deserve to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction [i.e., parties]."   

The goal sought by the Founding Fathers was to establish a stable government that, again to quote the Father of the Constitution, could protect "the diversity in the faculties of man" (that is, man's freedom and his right to different interests) as its first object, regulate the "various and interfering interests" arising from such freedom and diversity by allowing "justice . . . to hold the balance between them," and finally, do all this without government itself being controlled or unduly influenced by a given party or group of parties. "To secure the public good and private rights against the danger of . . . faction," he declared, "and at the same time to preserve the spirit and the form of popular government, is then the great object to which our inquiries are directed." A person, Madison concluded, "will not fail . . . to set a due value on any plan which, without violating the principles to which he is attached, provides a proper cure for it [i.e., party spirit and its influence]."   

The Founding Fathers, said E. E. Schattschneider, held "a legalistic concept of government incompatible with a satisfactory system of party government." By so organizing government as they did, he continued, "it was hoped that the parties would lose and exhaust themselves in futile attempts to fight their way through the labyrinthine framework of the government, much as an attacking army is expected to spend itself against the defensive works of a fortress." This was to hold true in the case of majority as well as minority parties and interests.   

"The Fathers," as Harry Elmer Barnes pointed out, "are conventionally held . . . to have been above party." But while some have considered them politically naive for espousing the ideal of government uncontrolled by parties, a deeper insight into their intentions reveals a view of political economy that lesser minds have failed to grasp. The truth of the situation is that "later generations have departed from what seems to have been their original intentions."   

To achieve a stable government that could secure the rights of the individual, administer justice, and preserve itself against the influence of self-interested and aspiring groups, several devices were to be operative. First, "a republic . . . promises the cure for which we are seeking," said Madison, while discussing the subject of how best to control the element of faction in a free society without "destroying the liberty which is essential to its existence." The "delegation of government," he explained, would "refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country, and whose patriotism and love of justice will be least likely to sacrifice it to temporary or partial consideration." In this process of refining and enlarging the public views, a given representative must weigh the validity of the claims and interests of each element he represents with impartial justice.   

The vertical separation of power between the federal, state, and local levels of government also aids in controlling the influence of political parties. Then, too, by organizing several states into a Federal Union, Madison argued, "you take in a greater variety of parties and interests," making "it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens" or the ability "to act in unison with each other" in achieving such ambitions. The separation of power horizontally between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches on both the state and the federal levels of government also provides a means of preserving government against the power of organized party interest. An organized party might gain control of one branch of government, but seldom all three branches on both the state and federal levels. In short, "in the extent and proper structure of the Union," as Madison concluded, "we behold a republican remedy for the disease most incident to republican government."   

In light of the ideal of government espoused by the Fathers, party spirit was to be abhorred. "Let me . . . warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party, generally," President Washington emphatically declared in his Farewell Address. He then continued:   

This Spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its roots in the strongest passions of the human mind.-It exists under different shapes in all Governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy. . . .   

In governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged.-From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose,-and there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it.-A fire not to be quenched; it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into flame, instead of warming, it should consume.   

It was held that the Kingdom of God would restore the true concept of government as envisioned by the Founding Fathers in 1787. George Q. Cannon, for example, argued that in that future day when the Latter-day Saints uphold "Constitutional government upon this continent," they will restore "the government to its primitive conditions, when all the political parties shall have fallen into chaos." Thus, Joseph Smith and his associates came closer to being the true successors of the Founding Fathers, in their original inspired concept of the Constitution, than any other body of American thinkers. It was that concept, fully developed in its guarantee of human freedom, that the Prophet held would one day be developed by the priesthood as God's program of government for the world.   

According to Joseph Smith, the Constitution was devised by God from the beginning to be a document of universal application. God did not intend it to be limited in its power and guarantee of liberty to America. The idea expressed in two revelation is that the Constitution "belongs to all mankind "that every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency" which I [the Lord] have given unto him." George Q. Cannon expressed this view while discusses Joseph Smith's thought on the subject. To quote:   

When he [God] establishes his kingdom it will protect all in their equal rights; I as a Latter-day Saint, will not have power to trample on my fellow-man who may not be orthodox in my opinion, because I am a Latter-day Saint; nor will my fellow-man to whom I am heterodox, have the power to trample upon me. Does not that look right? That is the kind of kingdom we have to contend for; that is the kind of kingdom we have to establish, and it is already provided for in the Constitution given unto us by God, and through the glorious labors of the fathers who laid the foundation of this government, who were inspired and raised [up] by our Almighty Father for this express purpose. there is no liberty that a human being can desire, neither is there a right that can be exercised properly, that we do not have under the Constitution of our land. It needs no amendment about it; it is broad enough, if interpreted in its true spirit, to cover the individual, the continent, and the entire globe and furnish freedom for all.   

It was held that in some future day the Kingdom of God would have two great centers of world government the City of Zion on our Western continent, and Jerusalem. Of the governmental position of the former center, Orson Pratt wrote:   

The law for the government of all nations will go forth from Zion, the same as the laws for the government of the United States now go forth from Washington. Zion will be the seat of government, and her officers will be far more respected, and have far more influence, than those of any government upon the earth; all nations will yield the most perfect obedience to their commands and counsels.   

Jerusalem, though not so prominent in matters of government, was also to be established as a center of political law for the eastern hemisphere. At a "great council of God in Jerusalem," Heber C. Kimball quoted the Prophet as stating, there would "be a uniting of the two divisions of God's government."   

As a world government based upon the United States Constitution, the government of God was to be a federal system that would include all nations of the earth, allowing each nationality and race the right to possess its own customs, religions, and cultural patterns. Each component unit, however, would be required to maintain a republican form of government. There would be power in the central organ to enforce this provision.   

Organizationally, there will be as "many officers and branches to that government" as there were in the government of the United States, Brigham Young explained. "There will be such helps, governments, etc., as the people require in their several capacities and circumstances." The government of God would have "every office, law and ordinance necessary for the managing of those who are unruly, or who transgress its laws, and to govern those who desire to do right, but can not quite walk to the line." Said President Young on another occasion:   

We shall be under the necessity of having courts organized, unless all are in the Lord and all walk in his way; if that were the case, I do not know that we should want any sheriff, marshal, constables, magistrates, jurors, Judges or governors, because the word of the Lord would govern and control every person; but until that time arrives we shall want officers, so that we will be prepared to reckon with the transgressors, and we shall have transgressors in building this kingdom, for it will be some time you before all are in the Lord.   

The Saints had their own views on  such particulars as the length of one's tenure in office and the remuneration he should receive. On the matter of tenure, Brigham young declared that a clause limiting a president to two terms should not be found in the Constitution of the United States, nor in the constitution made by this on any other people." Instead emphasis should be placed upon finding the best man for the responsibility. "And when we get a President that answers our wishes to occupy the executive change he said "There let him sit to the day of his death and pray that he may live as long as Methuselah" The same rule should hold true for other officers. Whenever we have good officers strive to retain them, and to fill up vacancies with good there he none who would let the nation sink for a can of oysters and a lewd woman." "Such is the Kingdom of God, in comparison" to established practices under the current system, he pointed out, while discussing the subject at another time. "When the best man is elected President, let him select the best men he can find for his counsellors or cabinet; and let all the officers within the province of the Chief Magistrate to appoint be selected upon the same principle to officiate wisely in different parts of the nation."   

When it came to the renumeration of officers in government, Joseph Smith set a fair example that emphasizes the basic Latter-day Saint view on the subject. It is reported that in serving as a councilman for the city of Nauvoo from February, 1841 to the middle of May, 1843 he received less than twenty-five dollars in all. Even while serving as mayor his income from all sources hardly gave him enough to live comfortably. Dedication to service was to be the ruling criterion. Excessive wages, it was argued, open the way to demagogy. Said Brigham Young on the correct policy to follow:   

Let the people see to it that they get righteous men to be their leaders, who will labour with their hands and administer to their own necessities, sit in judgment, legislate, and govern in righteousness; and officers that are filled with peace; and see to it that every man that goes forth among the people as a travelling officer is full of the fear of the Lord, and would rather do right at a sacrifice than do wrong for a reward.   

What would be the result, if this course was adopted by the people of the United States? It would destroy the golden prospects of those who were seeking for gain alone, and men would be sought for, in the nation, state, or territory, who were for the people, and would seek earnestly for their welfare, benefit and salvation. We want men to rule the nation who care more for and love better the nation's welfare than gold and silver, fame, or popularity.   

Brigham Young was speaking from experience when he dealt with this subject. The theocratic procedure of Zion's system better facilitates carrying out such a policy as he suggested. Conscientious men very often abhor the strife and strain of party politics, and thus avoid seeking for political office.   

To establish the Kingdom of God in its political authority would require a major concession on the part of non-Latter-day Saints: that of granting the appropriate priesthood councils in Zion the power to name men to governmental office, with the consent of the people. On the other hand, there were certain benefits the non-Latter-day Saint could expect to receive from accepting such a proposition. First, it would make possible the development of a world government in such a way as to promote brotherly union and avoid many of the difficulties associated with the formation and maintenance of a universal order under a political party system. For instance, people in highly civilized areas with relatively limited populations might be reluctant to join or uphold a world government wherein their interests were to be measured largely by the will of the majority. Under Joseph Smith's proposed system intelligence was to be exalted and dedicated to service through Zion's theocratic procedure, authority was to be decentralized to the level of its immediate operation through a federal system, and constitutional freedom was to be granted to all men. Highly civilized peoples could rest assured that the social, cultural, and economic advancements they had achieved would not be jeopardized by the whims and jealousies of the untutored masses.   

On the other hand, those among the great masses of humanity might be reluctant to enter and sustain a system where small and powerful minorities might exercise influence and power over them. To cope adequately with such an eventuality, the Prophet's system proposed two courses of action. First, the preservation of the freedom of the individual and the political integrity of each given unit was to be realized through the governmental system of the Kingdom of God.   

To understand the second proposal, the role of the society of Zion as a standard or ensign must be given further consideration. Among other things, Zion's socio-religious and economic system was to be based upon the proposition that men with wealth should consecrate of their properties to uplift the poor and downtrodden. As a standard of true social organization conspicuously centered at the focal point of interest in the new world government, Zion's example would promote union between the rich and the poor by proposing that the former assist the latter in developing the arts of true economic prosperity. There was to be no such thing as economic imperialism in the Prophet's program. And, as has already been pointed out, the example of Zion as a free, united and independent society was also expected to point the way to the solution of the great social and economic problems of mankind through mutual covenant and mutual love.   

In keeping with her role as a standard of true social organization, it was expected that Zion's moral and spiritual influence would be felt in molding public opinion and individual conduct toward the example set by the Saints. Here is the second benefit non-Latter-day Saints could expect from the Prophet's proposal. It is a recognized fact that the maintenance of free institutions depends upon an element of morality among the people. Long ago Aristotle, the great Greek philosopher and political theorist, gave his opinion that a democratic form of government was the best form of government, providing a high degree of morality existed among the people. However, he rated the same form of government as the least to be desired, where moral principle was not the guiding factor in the lives of the people. In the realm of modern economies, David McCord Wright, a contemporary economist of some repute, argues that there must be an uplifting moral element in a free society if men are to preserve the ideal of human dignity against the power of some degrading economic practices. Thus he concludes that a free society must have a recognized group or class capable of initiating good standards.   

Wright's argument is in harmony with Joseph Smith's position that a true society must uplift the individual while leaving him free. Written laws must only punish transgressors. The uplifting power must be persuasion. Here the society of Zion, by its example and influence, was expected to play an important role in the new world order. But more than this, Joseph Smith proposed that power be reposed in a moral and spiritual environment. Arnold J. Toynbee has more recently pointed out that such must be the case. Said this eminent historian:   

The great decisions of history are always moral. Technical accomplishments can be used either for good or for evil; some men must decide which it is to be. . . .   

You cannot escape the moral choice. It lies in wait at the end of every path. For each new instrument we conquer intensifies the effects of our virtue or vices. Every new scientific achievement offers a further test of our spiritual powers.   

The third benefit to be derived from Joseph Smith's proposal for a new world government under the Kingdom of God was that through this means the spiritual powers reposed in Zion could then be extended into the political sphere of society. The Prophet held that revelation and guidance from God must be used to direct the political affairs of men, if the world is to have peace. In a brilliant analysis of man's inability to govern himself and to promote his own happiness, Joseph Smith reviewed the record of history and picture of tyranny, oppression, and misrule among the nations of the earth in his day. In summarizing the many examples of man's inability to govern himself aright, he declared: "All, all, speak with a voice of thunder, that man is not able to govern himself, to legislate for himself, to protect himself, to promote his own good, nor the good of the world." To properly govern the world, he declared, "it needs the wisdom of God, the intelligence of God, and the power of God."   

Said Brigham Young of the power of spiritual forces as they were to exist in the Government of God:   

The kingdom that the Almighty will set up in the latter days will have its officers, and those officers will be peace. Every man that officiates in a public capacity will be filled with the Spirit of God, with the light of God, with the power of God, and will understand right from wrong, truth from error, light from darkness, that which tends to life and that which tends to death. They will say, "We offer you life; will you receive it?" "No," some will say. "Then you are at perfect liberty to choose death: the Lord does not, neither will we control you in the least in the exercise of your agency. We place the principles of life before you. Do as you please, and we will protect you in your rights, though you will learn that the system you have chosen to follow brings you to dissolution-to being resolved to native element."   

All the above factors and others were inherent in the Prophet's proposal for a world government. But while the Saints were considered as having their peculiar responsibilities in establishing and maintaining the Government of God, the immediate basis of agreement upon which all men were expected to accept and sustain the new political system was to be its guarantee of individual freedom. Thus the work of establishing the new government and spreading its powers abroad was looked upon as a co-operative effort on the part of members and non-members of the Church alike. In this light, the Quorum of the Twelve wrote, in 1847:   

Come then, ye Saints; come then, ye honorable men of the earth; come then ye wise, ye learned, ye rich, ye noble, according to the riches and wisdom, and knowledge of the Great Jehovah; from all nations, and kindreds, and kingdoms, and tongues, and people and dialects on the face of the whole earth, and join the standards of Emmanuel, and help us to build up the Kingdom of God, and establish the principles of truth, life and salvation. . . .   

The Kingdom of God consists in correct principles; and it mattereth not what a man's religious faith is, whether he be a Presyterian, or a Methodist, or a Baptist, or a Latter-day Saint or "Mormon," or a Catholic, or Episcopalian, or Mohammedan, or even pagan, or anything else, if he will bow the knee and with his tongue confess that Jesus is the Christ, and will support good and wholesome laws for the regulation of society,-we hail him as a brother, and will stand by him while he stands by us in these things; for every man's religious faith is a matter between his own soul and his God alone; but if he shall deny Jesus, if he shall curse God, if he shall indulge in debauchery and drunkenness, and crime; if he shall lie, and swear, and steal; if he shall take the name of the Great God in vain, and commit all manners of abominations, he shall have no place in our midst. . . .   

It was not expected that there would necessarily be a wholesale conversation to the religious principles of the Latter-day Saints to such extent that other faiths would cease to exist when God's political kingdom was established throughout the world. Said Brigham Young by way of explanation:   

If the Latter-day Saints think, when the Kingdom of God is established on the earth, that all the inhabitants of the earth will join the church called Latter-day Saints, they are egregiously mistaken. I presume there will be as many sects and parties then as now. Still, when the Kingdom of God triumphs, every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is the Christ, to the glory of the Father. Even the Jews will do it then; but will the Jews and Gentiles be obliged to belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? No; not by any means. Jesus said to his disciples, "In my Father's house are many mansions." . . . There are mansions in sufficient numbers to suit the different classes of mankind, and a variety will always exist to all eternity, requiring a classification and an arrangement into societies and communities in the many mansions which are in the Lord's house, and this will be so forever and ever.   

The establishment of the Kingdom of God throughout the earth was expected to fulfil the Lord's prayer, wherein it states: "Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven." In this great consummation, freedom and justice were to be established throughout the earth; and under the influence of the uplifting powers of the gospel, all men would then be raised to that plane of life which they, by the exercise of their own free agency, were capable of enjoying.   

The establishment of the Kingdom of God throughout the earth was also expected to fulfil the prophecy of Daniel, wherein the Hebrew prophet declared that the Kingdom of God would roll forth out of the mountains and fill the earth in the latter days. Said Brigham Young of the fully developed program envisioned by Joseph Smith: "This is the kingdom that Daniel spoke of, which was to be set up in the last days; it is the kingdom that is not to be given to another people."   

In interpreting Nebuchadnezzar's dream, Daniel explained that the Babylonian monarch had been shown the rise and fall of future world powers from the then existing kingdom of Babylon to the modern era of the national state system that came fully into being about the beginning of the nineteenth century. In the days of these latter-day kingdoms, Daniel declared, "shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break into pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever." The Hebrew prophet portrayed God's Kingdom of the latter days as a stone that would roll forth and fill the earth, following a period of international conflict that would eventually make a full end of all nations.   

In the minds of the Latter-day Saints, the Kingdom of God that Daniel spoke of included a program of world government. While explaining the "grand panorama of kingdoms" portrayed in Nebuchadnezzar's dream, Orson Pratt said: "It was a prophetic scenery, reaching to the latter times, showing him how man-made governments should be destroyed, and how the divine government should succeed and triumph, and have universal and everlasting dominion on the earth." Said Brigham Young:   

The kingdom that Daniel saw will push forth its law, and that law will protect the Methodists, Quakers, Pagans, Jews, and every other creed there ever was or ever will be, in their religious rights. . . . The kingdom that Daniel saw will actually make laws to protect every man in his rights, as our government does now, whether the religions of the people are true or false.   

An analysis of Mormon thought leads one to conclude that Joseph Smith and his associates did not necessarily expect the new world order to be ushered in immediately. "Is man prepared to receive that government?" Brigham Young inquired in 1859. "He is not," he concluded. "I can say to these Latter-day Saints, you are not prepared to receive that government." It would take a millennial people to establish a millennial government. Nor could the new government be established throughout the world without the co-operation of the peoples of the earth. Should they fail to give the necessary consideration to God's plan for universal peace, the Prophet held there would develop an era of warfare and international destruction that would eventually "make a full end of all nations." Then, if not before, the peoples of the world would turn to the program he had been instrumental in initiating and co-operate in developing its blessings and powers throughout the earth. Meanwhile, it was hoped that an understanding of the principles and responsibilities of the latter-day kingdom would grow in the hearts and minds of the people. Said Brigham Young:   

The principles, doctrines, germ, and, I may say, marrow of that Kingdom are actually planted on the earth, but does it grow to perfection at once? No. When wheat is planted and germinates, you first see the blade, and by and by the head forming in the boot, from which in due time it bursts forth and makes its appearance.   

The basic concept of the Kingdom of God as Joseph Smith defined it has been presented in this chapter. That concept was more than an ideal in the minds of the Prophet and his associates. It had a practical impact upon the history of the Mormon movement that has not before been pointed out or appreciated. Attention will now be turned to a brief analysis of some aspects of Church history, as directly influenced by the General Council and its ideal of world government.   

Footnotes   

 

 1. History of the Church, VI, 365. Hereafter this work will be cited as D.H.C., with the appropriate volume and page number.   

 2. D.H.C., V, 64 (Italics added by the writer).   

 3. Under date of May 13, 1844.   

 4. "The Minutes of the Council of Fifty," Saturday, April 10, 1880, City Hall, Salt Lake City, state that this organization was effected April 7, 1842. This document is a very brief report of the meeting of the Council of Fifty, for April 10 and 21, 1880. The minutes of both meetings consist of less than 150 words. A roll of the April 10th meeting is appended, giving the names of 52 men who were present. The April 10th minutes appear to have been written by Francis M. Lyman, as the following comment is made and initialed F.M.L.: "Being called into the Council appears to me to be one of the greatest steps in my life." The writer possesses a personal copy of these minutes from which the above is taken.   

The date given in these minutes is no doubt an error, as Joseph Smith was engaged throughout the day in activities of a non-political nature. March 11, 1844, is the date the Prophet and Brigham Young gave for the organization of this council. It is also confirmed by other evidence to be given hereafter.   

 5. See D.H.C., VI, 260-1, 263, 264.   

 6. See ibid., pp. 274, 343, 356, etc. This was not the first use of the term "General Council" in Mormon history, as we find special bodies referred to by this name before the organization of the 1844 group.   

 7. John D. Lee, A Mormon Chronicle: The Diaries of John D. Lee, 1848-1876, ed. Robert Class Cleland and Juanita Brooks (San Marino: Huntington Library, 1955), Vol. I, p. 89. The Journal History also refers to this body as "The Council" or "Our Council" during the early Utah period.   

 8. This name was also abbreviated to the "Fifties." See Heman Hale Smith, "The Lyman Wight Colony in Texas, 1846-1858," unpublished typewritten manuscript, Brigham Young University Library, p. 22.   

 9. George Miller, Sr. and George Miller, Jr., A Mormon Bishop and His Son, Fragments of a Diary kept by George Miller, Sr., Bishop in the Mormon Church, and some records of incidents in the life of G. Miller, Jr., Hunter and Pathfinder, ed. H. M. Mills (London, England; nd) p. 48.   

 10. "History of Brigham Young," Millennial Star, XXVI, 328-9.   

 11. Benjamin F. Johnson, "An Interesting Letter," unpublished letter from Johnson to George S. Gibbs, April to July, 1903, Brigham Young University Library, p. 9.   

 12. Miller, op cit., pp. 28-9.   

 13. See ibid., p. 49.   

 14. Part of this revelation is quoted in the "Minutes of the Council of Fifty," op. cit. See also Lee, op. cit., pp. 97-8, for another citation from this revelation where the above name is given.   

 15. J. D., XVII, 156.   

 16. Lee, op. cit., p. 80. The writer has taken the liberty of editing this quotation by supplying some needed punctuation marks and correcting misspelled words. Later quotations from Lee's diaries-published and unpublished-will also be edited in a similar manner.   

 17. J.D., V, 23-5.    

 18. D.H.C., V, 256-9.   

 19. J.D., II, 317. The term Kingdom of God is used here to denote the Government of God. This is also true in some other quotes used in this study.   

 20. Ibid., VI, 25.   

 21. Ibid., XV, 44-5.   

 22. D.H.C., VII, 381-2.   

 23. Lee, op. cit., p. 80.   

 24. "History of Brigham Young," pp. 328-9.   

 25. D.H.C., VII, 382.   

 26. Ibid. (Italics by the writer). Here again the term Kingdom of God is used to denote the Government of God.   

 27. Millennial Star, XXV, 136. Lyman Wight also evidenced a similar lack of understanding on this point. In contending that Joseph, the son of the Prophet should have been ordained to succeed his martyred father, Wight said:   

". . . what should be done? I will here state the first thing to have been done would have been to have called the fifties together from the four quarters of the earth, which contained all the highest authorities of the church. As you will readily see, that had not the fifty constituted the highest authorities, it would have been a species of weakness to have ordained all the highest authorities into that number. The fifties assembled should have called on all the authorities of the church down to the lay-members from all the face of the earth, as much as was convenient, and after having taken sweet counsel together, in prayer and supplication before God, acknowledged our sins and transgressions which had caused our head to be taken from our midst; and then have called on young Joseph, and held him up before the congregation of Israel to take his father's place in the flesh! Then should he have received intelligence of our forgiveness of our sins and transgressions, and we had then gone on and finished the temple according to [the] revelations of God, and the word of his servants-then should we so have done-then should the fifty have sallied forth unto all the world, and built up according to the pattern which Bro. Joseph had given; the Twelve to have acted in two capacities, one in opening the gospel to the world, and organizing churches; and then what would have been still greater, to have counseled in the Grand Council of heaven, in gathering in the house of Israel and establishing Zion to be thrown down no more forever. In this way the church might have moved smoothly on, and onward, until the final redemption of Zion, and the building of the great temple therein."-Address of Lyman Wight, written in December, 1851. Cited in History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, 1836-1844, ed. Joseph Smith and Heman C. Smith (Lamoni, Iowa: Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 1920), II, 790-1.   

 28. Johnson to Gibbs, p. 9. There may be a question whether Sidney Rigdon was a member of the council or not. On date of March 19, 1844, Joseph Smith reported that Rigdon with others met with the council. D.H.C., VI, 267; Millennial Star, XXVI, p. 329. Sidney Rigdon was later nominated by this council to be Joseph Smith's running mate in the 1844 campaign. See D.H.C., VI, 356.   

 29. Johnson to Gibbs, p. 10. (Italics by the writer.) A statement by Orson Hyde seems to confirm Johnson's report that the Prophet's charge was made during a meeting of the General Council. Hyde declared that Joseph Smith made this charge "in the presence of about sixty men." J.D., XIII, 180.   

 30. James E. Talmage, Articles of Faith (Salt Lake City, 1942), p. 366.   

 31. J.D., XVIII, 137.   

 32. Moses 7, 18-21.   

 33. D.H.C., I, 269.   

 34. D&C 78:13-5. (Italics by the writer.)   

 35. J.D., VI, 346-7.   

 36. Ibid., III, 71-2.   

 37. Ibid., VII, 8.   

 38. Ibid., V, 329-30.   

 39. Ibid., XXI, 31.   

 40. Ibid., II, 170.   

 41. Ibid., VII, 215.   

 42. Ibid., III, 71-3. See also, The Seer, I (October, 1853), 147-8.   

 43. The Seer, I (October, 1853), 149.   

 44. J.D., XIII, 125-6.   

 45. Johnson to Gibbs, p. 8.   

 46. J.D., II, 317.   

 47. Ibid., IX, 10.   

 48. Ibid., VI, 342. (Italics added by the writer.)   

 49. Moses 1:39.   

 50. J.D., VII, 8.   

 51. Ibid., VI, 346.   

 52. Ibid., VII, 8. He further explained:   

"The question, What is a true Republican government? is easily answered. It is a government or institution that is perfect-perfect in its laws and ordinances, having for its object the perfection of mankind in righteousness. This is true Democracy. But Democracy as it is now is another thing. True Democracy or Republicanism, if it were rightly understood, ought to be the Government of the United States." Ibid., p. 10.   

 53. The Seer, II, 266-7.   

 54. The Deseret Evening News, VIII (October 2, 1875), No. 265.   

 55. See Madison's full argument in his Federalist, No. 10.   

 56. E. E. Schattschneider, Party Government (New York, 1942), pp. 6-10. In explaining this fact, he further states:   

"Everyone who has thought about it at all has recognized that the parties and the law are nonassimilable. The extra-legal character of political parties is one of their most notable qualities. In a highly legalistic system of government such as the government of the United States, therefore, the parties seem to be a foreign substance."-Idem.   

 57. Harry Elmer Barnes, History and Social Intelligence (New York, 1926), pp. 342-6.   

 58. Edward Stanwood, A History of the Presidency (Boston and New York, 1898), p. 10.   

 59. The Federalist, No. 10.   

 60. Idem.   

 61. Idem. Lord Acton has more recently stated:   

"Of all checks on democracy, federation has been the most efficacious and the most congenial. . . . The federal system limits and restrains the sovereign power by dividing it and by assigning to Government only certain defined rights. It is the only method of curbing not only the majority but the power of the whole people." Cited in Friedrich A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, with foreword by John Chamberlain (Chicago, 1944), p. 219.   

 62. J.D., XX, 204. Cannon stated that Joseph Smith set the pattern for the views he then expressed.   

 63. D&C 98:5; 101:77-80. (Italics by the writer.)   

 64. J.D., XX, 204. (Italics by the writer.)   

 65. According to a revelation to Joseph Smith, this city is to be built at Independence, Jackson County, Missouri. It is also referred to in Mormon thought as the New Jerusalem. See D&C 57:1-4; Ether 13.   

 66. The Seer, II (May, 1854), 266-7.   

 67. See Parley P. Pratt "Proclamation of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," published by Wilford Woodruff, at Liverpool, England, October 22, 1845, pp. 7-10.   

 68. J.D., VII, 142.   

 69. See D.H.C., VI, 197-209, in which Joseph Smith discussed the subject. See also J.D., VII, 13, for a statement by Brigham Young.   

 70. J.D., 316, XV, 161.   

 71. Ibid., XV, 161.   

 72. Ibid., VII, 11, 14.   

 73. Ibid., VI, 345.   

 74. John Henry Evans, Joseph Smith, an American Prophet (New York, 1946), p. 256.   

 75. J.D., VII, 11-2.   

 76. See D&C 42:30. See also sections 51, 78, 82, 96, 104, 105.   

 77. See David McCord Wright, Democracy and Progress (New York, 1950), p. 25.   

 78. Arnold J. Toynbee, "We Can Build a Better World," Look, XII (August 17, 1948), 25.   

 79. D.H.C., V, 61-66.   

 80. J.D., VI, 345-6.   

 81. Millennial Star, X, 81-88.   

 82. J.D., XI, 275.   

 83. Matthew 6:10.   

 84. J.D., XVII, 156.   

 85. Daniel 2.   

 86. The Seer, II (August, 1854), 310. See also ibid., I (October, 1853), 148; J.D., 86, for other statements by Orson Pratt.   

 87. J.D., II, 189. See also ibid., I, 202-3; XIII, 125, for other statements by Brigham Young. For a good statement by Wilford Woodruff, see, ibid., XIII, 164.   

 88. Ibid., VII, 142.   

 89. D&C 87.   

 90. J.D., II, 309.   

   

Chapter II

Organizing the Government of God

 

THE STORY of the organization of the political department of the Kingdom of God has never before been told, except in brief and incomplete statements made by some of its early members. The development of the new adjunct to the priesthood did not come without forethought on the part of the Prophet. Under date of February 20, 1844, he reported:   

I instructed the Twelve Apostles to send out a delegation and investigate the locations of California and Oregon, and hunt out a good location, where we can build a city in a day, and have a government of our own, get up into the mountains, where the devil cannot dig us out, and live in a healthful climate, where we can live as old as we have a mind to.   

The immediate incentive to commence organizing the Government of God came with Joseph Smith's effort to move the Saints to the West. In this effort he and others claimed the assistance of divine revelation. Contrary to what is sometimes supposed, however, it required thought, exertion, and the consideration of several alternatives before the picture of precisely where to locate the Saints in the West was made clear. God's injunction to first "study it out in your mind" was still in force. Revelation on matters pertaining to the exodus of the Saints was not considered as being automatic, any more than the revelation process Joseph Smith claimed to utilize in the translation of the Book of Mormon. Thus, we find the Mormon leader studying things out and considering several programs and alternatives for planting his followers in the West. One plan he considered was to colonize a portion of Texas. It was while considering this plan that Joseph Smith organized the nucleus of the Government of God.   

During the early 1840's, a group of men known as the Black River Lumber Company had been located at Black River Falls, Wisconsin Territory, for the purpose of getting out lumber for the construction of the Nauvoo Temple and the Nauvoo House. After having to a great extent accomplished their mission, the group in the "Pineries" wrote to the Authorities at Nauvoo expressing their desire to remove to "the tablelands of Texas." There they proposed to establish "a place of gathering for all the South." From this region they hoped to spread the gospel throughout Texas, Brazil, the West Indian Islands and adjacent areas. When Bishop George Miller delivered two letters expressing the desire of these men, Joseph Smith commented: "I perceive that the spirit of God is in the pineries as well as here, and we will call together some of our wise men, and proceed to set up the Kingdom of God by organizing some of its officers."   

The Prophet's comment that the Spirit of the Lord was in the pineries as well as at Nauvoo implies that he recognized the suggestions on the part of the above group to be generally in accord with his own inspiration to look toward the West. The removal of the Saints to the West, however, was not a function to be carried out by the Church as a religious body. For this reason the Prophet commenced organizing the Government of God. The fact that he did so indicates the limitations he set to the powers of the Church and the separate and distinct functions of the Church and the political organ he developed.   

The Prophet's account of the organization of the latter body is as follows:   

Present-Joseph Smith, Hyrum Smith, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, Willard Richards, Parley P. Pratt, Orson Pratt, John Taylor, George A. Smith, William W. Phelps, John M. Bernhisel, Lucien Woodworth, George Amos Fielding, Alpheus Cutler, Levi Richards, Newel K. Whitney. Lorenzo D. Wasson, and William Clayton, whom I organized into a special council, to take into consideration the subject matter contained in the above letters, and also the best policy for this people to adopt to obtain their rights from the nation and insure protection for themselves and children; and to secure a resting place in the mountains, or some uninhabited region, where we can enjoy the liberty of conscience guaranteed to us by the Constitution of our country, and rendered doubly sacred by the precious blood of our fathers, and denied to us by the present authorities, who have smuggled themselves into power in the States and Nation.   

In his report of the organization of this council, Brigham Young also noted that it was to be an organ concerned with political matters. It had as its objective, he said, the task of determining "the best manner to settle our people in some distant and unoccupied territory; where we could enjoy our civil and religious rights, without being subject to constant oppression and mobocracy, under the protection of our own laws, subject to the Constitution. We held a number of sessions," he continued, "and investigated the principles upon which our national government is founded; and the true foundation and principles of all governments."   

It is very probable that during one of the above mentioned meetings Joseph Smith dictated the revelation giving the constitutional principles of the new government.   

The General Council also prepared several memorials to Congress for redress of grievances. One such memorial was delivered to the Federal government by Heber C. Kimball and Lyman Wight, who left Nauvoo for that purpose on May 20, 1844. But the main task of the council was to settle the Saints in the West. We shall see later how this body of men initiated and carried out the exodus and the colonization of the Great Basin.   

Meetings of the General Council were held almost daily for some time after its organization. On March 14th, Joseph Smith reported that Lucien Woodworth had been "sent on a mission to Texas." The nature of his mission is not revealed in the Prophet's record. However, George Miller reports that the intention was to "send a minister to the then Republic of Texas to make a treaty with the cabinet of Texas for all that country north of a west line from the falls of the Colorado River to the Nueces, thence down the same to the Gulf of Mexico, and along the same to the Rio Grande, and up the same to the United States Territory." Texas was expected to acknowledge the Saints "as a nation," said Miller. On the other hand, the Saints were to help the Texas government "defend themselves against Mexico, standing as a go-between [between] the billigerant powers." Woodworth was chosen to represent the interest of the Saints in these negotiations. In the event an agreement was finally entered into, the Black River Lumber Company was "to take possession of the newly acquired territory."   

Miller's statement that Texas was expected to acknowledge the Latter-day Saints as "a nation" needs some explanation. This statement implies that the Prophet was considering the possibility of moving the whole Church to the above described area. That some consideration was given to such a move is no doubt true. How seriously Joseph Smith looked upon that plan and how far he went in carrying it out, however, is another matter. At first it seems that only the Black River Lumber Company was to go to Texas, following the completion of the proper negotiations. There they were to establish "a place of gathering for all the South."   

In a letter dated June 12, 1849, Miller wrote:   

In the spring of 1844, Joseph organized a council of fifty. I was one of that number. The question arose in regard to settling those Saints in the South, that were making lumber in Wisconsin, for building the temple and Nauvoo House. The decision of the council was had, and Lucien Woodworth, George Miller, and Lyman Wight appointed to settle the company and their families, and procure a place for a stake for the gathering of the saints; whereupon Lucien Woodworth forthwith started to Texas and returned the first of May. He negotiated with Samuel Houston (then President of the Republic of Texas) for a district of country to colonize the before mentioned saints upon, which was to have been ratified at the meeting of the Texas Congress. . . .   

In the same light, Brigham Young and Willard Richards wrote from Nauvoo to Reuben Hedlock, in England, May 3, 1844: "If any of the brethren wish to go to Texas, we have no particular objection. You may send a hundred thousand there if you can." Then, with reference to the newly organized political organ, they added: "The kingdom is organized; and, although as yet no bigger than a grain of mustard seed, the little plant is in a flourishing condition, and our prospects brighter than ever."   

There are several matters that must be considered along with the Texas episode if one is to get an accurate picture of this phase of Mormon history, according to the available facts. First, a word about the historical picture. The territory then under consideration as a place of settlement for the Saints "was a portion of the territory in dispute between Texas and Mexico." It had been ceded to Texas when she won her independence from Mexico in 1836. President Santa Anna, having been captured by the Texans, was forced to "sign a treaty as president of Mexico recognizing the independence of Texas and the territorial claim of that republic as far south as the Rio Grande." His authority to do this was later challenged by the Mexican congress upon the grounds that he had no right to relinquish so extensive a grant, much of which the Texans could not claim as land they had settled.   

Following the release of Santa Anna, the Mexicans promptly repudiated the treaty of Velasco and thereafter kept up a series of threats, intrigues with the Indians, and petty raids aimed at destroying the new republic. Matters would have been worse had it not been that the antagonists were separated from each other by an uninhabited strip spreading northeastward from the Rio Grande and varying in width from about one hundred and twenty miles at the coast to over six hundred at its upper end.   

The Texas government was anxious to have strong groups of colonists take over the job of settling her vast uninhabited regions, including the above territory. It was in desperate need of money; and its principle source of revenue came from the sale of public lands. For these and other reasons, several colonizing schemes were given more or less serious considerations, including an attempt to locate 8,000 French colonists "in such a way as to create a shield between the hostile Indians and the outermost Texan settlers." The so-called Kennedy Grant of 1842 was another attempt to colonize a large number of European settlers in Texas.   

During the forepart of 1843, an armistice was agreed upon by Texas and Mexico, which lasted until June, 1844. Here was an opportune time for the two powers to arrive at some agreement regarding the disputed Territory. It was during the latter part of this period that the Mormon leaders were negotiating with the Texas Government. There is some evidence that the government of Mexico was also a party to these negotiations.   

Back at the center of Mormon activities in Nauvoo, Joseph Smith reported that on May 2, 1844, Lucien Woodworth returned from Texas, where he had been sent by the General Council pursuant to their meeting of March 14th. The following day he gave an account of his mission to that body. In a letter dated June 28, 1855, George Miller wrote of these developments. Said he:   

. . . Woodworth returned from Texas. The council convened to hear his report. It was altogether as we could wish it. On the part of the church there were commissioners appointed to meet the Texan Congress to sanction or ratify the said treaty, partly entered into by our minister and the Texan cabinet. A Mr. Brown, Lucien Woodworth and myself were the commissioners appointed to meet the Texas Congress, and, upon the consummation of the treaty, Wight and myself were to locate the Black River Lumber Company on the newly acquired territory, and do such other things as might be necessary in the premises, and report to the Council of the Kingdom. It was further determined in Council that all the elders should set out on missions to all the States to get up an electorial ticket, and do everything in our power to have Joseph elected president. If we succeeded in making a majority of the voters converts to our faith, and elected Joseph president, in such an event the dominion of the Kingdom would be forever established in the United States; and if not successful, we could fall back on Texas, and be a kingdom notwithstanding.   

Miller's statement implies that the plan to move the Church to Texas was pretty much decided upon at this time. This, however, was not the fact. According to available information there were two general purposes behind the Prophet's negotiations with the Texas government. The first has been mentioned: that of establishing a stake of Zion in that area as a gathering place for the Saints. In this plan, there was no intention to move the whole Church to Texas. Second, there was evidently some talk of setting up an independent government in that area, should circumstances make it necessary to do so. The latter proposal, however, was but one of other alternatives then being considered by the Prophet and his associates. He was then a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. In his "Views of the Powers and Policies of the Government of the United States," he clearly defines himself as an expansionist-one who desired to extend the jurisdiction of the United States as far west as possible. "Oregon belongs to this government honorably," he exclaimed, "and when we have the red man's consent, let the Union spread from the east to the west sea; and if Texas petitions Congress to be adopted among the sons of liberty, give her the right hand of fellowship, and refuse not the same friendly grip to Canada and Mexico." These views are consistent with the Prophet's concept of the United States Constitution as a heaven-inspired document containing principles destined to be extended throughout the world. They leave little room for belief that he hoped to establish an independent state in the Texas area outside of the jurisdiction of the United States Constitution, except as a plan of last resort subject to the outcome of other alternatives. Again, the intent behind the organization of the General Council was to establish the Saints in the West under their own political laws, "subject to the Constitution."   

The reasons why Joseph Smith decided to run for the Presidency will not be discussed here. Suffice it to say that foremost among those reasons was his desire to bring the cause of the Saints before the nation and thus gain redress for the wrongs that had been perpetrated upon them. This objective might have been achieved without winning the election.   

The Prophet was aware that should he be elected it would only be by the greatest possible effort and through the favor of fortune. Said George Miller: "It was thought and urged by the council that so great an undertaking would require, in order to insure success, the entire and united effort of the official members of the church." Accordingly, the Quorum of the Twelve made arrangement for a series of conferences to be held in strategic places throughout the Union, terminating at Washington, D. C. the following September 7th through the 15th. Besides the twelve, nearly 340 of the most capable men in the Church were also sent out to work in the Prophet's interest throughout the Union. That the General Council was involved in these matters is evident not only from Miller's comments but also from the following notation made by Joseph Smith, April 25th:   

In general council from 10 till 12, and from 2 to 5, when they adjourned sine die, after appointing a State Convention to meet in Nauvoo on 17th May. The council then dispersed to go abroad in the nations.   

During the period of his negotiations with the Texas government, Joseph Smith was also seeking for authority from the Federal government to raise a police force of 100,000 men to establish the jurisdiction of the United States throughout the West and to give protection and order to the colonization of that vast area. The memorial was drawn up by Willard Richards and "read, discussed, and approved by the general council" on March 26, 1844, almost two weeks after Woodworth's initial commission to go to Texas. A similar memorial was later prepared for President John Tyler, in the event the first should fail to be accepted by Congress. Orson Hyde was chosen to carry the memorials to Washington and there work with Orson Pratt and John E. Page to secure the passage of the first through Congress. Though it failed to gain the support of Congress, this memorial reveals the Prophet's desire to assist in extending the westward border of the United States to the Pacific and to open this new territory to the American homebuilder, along with his own people. The Prophet's proposal was by nature incompatible with any plan to establish an independent government in the area of Texas.   

On May 13th, Joseph Smith attended a meeting of the General Council, at which time two letters from Orson Hyde were read. In the first, dated April 25th, Hyde reported that Congress appeared "deeply interested in the Oregon question," but due to several factors involving them in national and international politics they were not apt to act favorably upon the Prophet's memorial. Nevertheless, Hyde stated, there was a general consensus of opinion that the Mormon leader had "an undoubted right" to colonize his people in some area of the West, but it would have to be without government support. In his concluding paragraph, Hyde wrote:    

. . . Most of the settlers in Oregon and Texas are our old enemies, the mobocrats of Mo. If, however, the settlement of Oregon or Texas be determined upon, the sooner the move is made the better, and I would not advise any delay for the action of government for there is such a jealousy of our rising power already, that government will do nothing to favor us. If the saints possess the kingdom, I think they will have to take it, and the sooner it is done, the more easily it is accomplished.   

Your superior wisdom must determine whether to go to Oregon, to Texas, or to remain within these United States and send forth the most efficient men to build up churches, and let them remain for the time being.   

To Hyde, the Texas matter was still open for discussion.   

In his second letter, dated April 26th, Hyde reported that the Mormon delegates in Washington had held a long conversation with Stephen A. Douglas; and reported that "he is ripe for Oregon and the California." The Senator from Illinois was said to have declared that "he would resign his seat in Congress if he could command the force that Mr. Smith could, and would be on the march to the country in a month." Douglas also agreed that the Latter-day Saints had a legitimate right to raise up an independent nation in the West, should it be necessary. Hyde wrote: "Douglas says he would equally as soon go to that country without an act of Congress as with; 'and that in five years a noble state might be formed; and then if they would not receive us into the Union, we would have a government of our own.'"   

Finally, in a letter dated April 30, 1844, Hyde reviewed the various alternatives, one of which the Saints might choose in locating themselves in the West. Among other things, he mentioned the possibility of establishing a stake of Zion in Texas, as a gathering place for some of the Saints. But when it came to the proposal to set up an independent government in that area, Hyde struck a note of caution. Should such a plan be followed, he pointed out, the Saints would be forced to organize and support both an army and a navy in addition to the costs of government in its functions at home and abroad. Such a load, he concluded, would discourage those who had money to invest in the area and might even sink the infant government.   

From the above evidence, it is plain that the plan to move the Church to Texas was never really decided upon. In the minds of the Mormon leaders, such a decision was not to be made until after the election of 1844. And even then it would be subject to existing circumstances. So far as Texas and Mexico were concerned, their armistice was terminated in June, 1844; and with the election of Polk to the Presidency the stage was set for the entrance of Texas into the Union, followed by the outbreak of the war with Mexico.   

What Joseph Smith would have done about Texas had his life not been abruptly terminated may be subject to debate. In light of the post-election situation and the threat of war with Mexico, however, it seems highly probable that he would have looked elsewhere, as Brigham Young later did. About all that can be truthfully said, from existing evidence, is that the Prophet was considering several plans by which to secure his people in the free exercise of their constitutional rights. He sought for this end by bringing the injustices the Saints had suffered to the attention of the nation through his campaign for the presidency; he sought for the consent and assistance of the Federal government in locating the Saints and others in the West; and, finally, he even considered the alternative of establishing the Saints in the capacity of an independent nation, should all other alternatives fail.   

There should be no particular odium attached to the fact that the Prophet gave consideration to this latter alternative. It is a fundamental proposition upon which legitimate governments are founded that all men have the inherent right to provide for their political welfare-to establish justice and provide for their domestic transquility. Brigham Young, in officially organizing the State of Deseret in 1849, relied upon this inherent right. In doing so, he was establishing what the Saints considered to be the Government of God. But even though they considered the government of Deseret in this light, they immediately applied for statehood in the Union. It can be conjectured that, had Joseph Smith lived and gone to Texas, he too would have applied for statehood in the Union as soon as conditions were favorable. As it was, the existing circumstances made it necessary for the Latter-day Saints to consider establishing an independent government of their own, in the event they went to Texas. First, they could not hope to extend United States jurisdiction into this particular area had they wanted to obtain a territorial government. An effort to do so would surely have been resented by Mexico. On the other hand, it would have been impracticable to consider affiliating with either the government of Texas or Mexico. Neither of these countries would have been willing to see so large a body as the Latter-day Saints occupy this disputed territory under the flag of the other country. Nor would association with either of these countries have been compatible with the aims and aspirations of the Prophet and his associates in relation to their views on the Kingdom of God and the United States Constitution. The only alternative left was to plan for a government that would in every way meet their needs and satisfy their desires, should they make this move.   

It should be noted that in his effort to lay the necessary plans for such an eventuality, the Prophet came very near entering the field of international politics. On May 6, 1844, Joseph Smith recorded that he met with the General Council all day. During this meeting it was "voted to send Almon W. Babbitt on a mission to France and Lucien Woodworth to Texas." The nature of Woodworth's mission to Texas has already been indicated. But the purpose of Babbitt's assignment to go to France is not too clear. By profession he was a lawyer. That the Council of Fifty, after deliberating all day, would vote to send Babbitt to France on business of a religious nature, while Woodworth went to Texas to consider further negotiations on a treaty for the organization of a new state in the West, seems highly improbable. It would be more in harmony with existing developments to send Babbitt to France to determine the French government's reaction to the organization of such a state. A comment by Brigham Young and Willard Richards in their letter to Reuben Hedlock in England, dated three days before the above meeting, seems to confirm this view, as well as to indicate that the decision to send an envoy to France had received some thought prior to the May 6th meeting. They wrote:   

We are glad to hear a door is open in France, and sure we have no objections to your going over and preaching. . . . We are in hopes of sending a special messenger to France in a few days; if so, very likely he may call on you, and you pass over and give him an introduction: this would be pleasant for you all.   

A study of Babbitt's activities thereafter, however, shows that he never departed on this mission. It may be that Orson Hyde's letter from Washington, along with other developments prior to the time Babbitt was ready to leave Nauvoo, changed the Mormon attitude on the Texas proposal. Then, too, developments leading up to the Prophet's martyrdom also kept him busy in Illinois.   

The death of Joseph Smith, the changing political scene, and the existing need to consolidate affairs under new leadership altered the plans that had been partially made concerning the Texas proposal. It was at this point that a decision was definitely made to move to the Great Basin. Said George A. Smith:   

After the death of Joseph Smith, when it seemed as if every trouble and calamity had come upon the Saints, Brigham Young, who was President of the Twelve, then the presiding Quorum of the Church, sought the Lord to know what they should do, and where they should lead the people for safety, and while they were fasting and praying daily on this subject, President Young had a vision of Joseph Smith, who showed him the mountain that we now call Ensign Peak, immediately north of Salt Lake City, and there was an ensign fell upon that peak, and Joseph said, "Build under the point where the colors fall and you will prosper and have peace." The Pioneers had no pilot or guide, none among them had ever been in the country or knew anything about it. However, they travelled under the direction of President Young until they reached this valley. When they entered it, President Young pointed to the point and, said he, "I want to go there." He went up to the point and said, "This is Ensign Peak. Now, brethren, organize your exploring parties, so as to be safe from Indians; go and explore where you will, and you will come back every time and say this is the best place." They accordingly started out exploring companies and visited what we now call Cache, Malad, Tooele, and Utah valleys, and other parts of the country in various directions, but all came back and declared this was the best spot.   

But to such men as George Miller and Lyman Wight the previous proposals were still to be carried out. Miller later wrote that he suggested that the appropriate authorities get together and "clothe" themselves "with the necessary papers, and proceed to meet the Texas Congress as before Joseph's death agreed upon". Continuing, he explained:   

Woodworth and myself waited on Brigham, requesting him to convene the authorities so that the proper papers might be made out, and so we could be able to complete the unfinished negotiations of the treaty for the territory mentioned in my former letter. To my utter astonishment Brigham wholly refused to have anything to do in the matter, saying that he had no faith in it, and would do nothing to raise means for an outfit or expenses. Thus all hopes were cut off of establishing a dominion of the kingdom at a time when there seemed to be a crisis, and I verily believed that all that we had concocted in council might so easily be accomplished. I was really cast down and dejected.   

Meanwhile, said Miller, "Lyman Wight became disaffected towards his brethren of the Twelve." When the Black River Lumber Company returned to Nauvoo, he, "ever fond of authority, placed himself at the head of this company, and as it had been announced by the Twelve from the stand that Joseph had laid out a work that would take twenty years to accomplish, Lyman averred that he would commence his work then, and solicited me to take my place and go with him to locate the Black River Company." Although Miller reluctantly followed the leadership of Brigham Young for a time, Wight set out for Texas. Some time later, when Brigham Young summoned him to Salt Lake City, Wight replied that "nobody under the light of the heavens except Joseph Smith or John Smith, the president of the Fifty, could call him from Texas." There he remained while the Church commenced the colonization of the Great Basin.   

Footnotes   

 

 1. D.H.C., VI, 222.   

 2. D&C 9.   

 3. D.H.C., VI, 256, 258.   

 4. Miller, op. cit., 48.